Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shawn's avatar

Thank you Amanda. When you point to a better way for news – how it might look and what it might induce in us – I feel like your ideas are the 'what' to the 'why,' answers to a question that needs to be asked more directly: What is news for? What is the purpose of news?

The most generous current answer to that question seems to be that news exists to tell us what just happened somewhere. And then of course commercial incentives drive news content in the direction of what makes us most angry and anxious.

When I ask myself, "why do I need to know about [thing that just happened]?" the answer that comes back is often, "well actually, I don't." I don't need to know because, well, for the reasons you mentioned: it brings me down, and I can't do anything about a lot of it.

So what *should* news be for? I like your answers, and I summarize them for myself as:

- News should tell us about what's happening (not the same thing as 'what just happened')

- News should help us understand how we fit in, what we can *do* about what's happening

- News should strive to look through a lens that's constructive and even hopeful

Expand full comment
PhillyT's avatar

Needed to read this today. Thank you!

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts